Case 3303154/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jatinder Kaur v TG Beauty Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303154/2020
- Decision date
- 30 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jatinder Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Jatinder Kaur was employed by TG Beauty Ltd as a beautician/beauty therapist from 5 December 2018 to 20 December 2019 on a variable-hours contract. The tribunal rejected the respondent’s suggestion that there had been two separate periods of employment and found that the employment was continuous. It also found that the claimant’s leave year ran from 1 January to 31 December under the contract, but that the claim was brought in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found the claimant had been underpaid accrued holiday pay on termination by £333.01 gross. | Upheld | — | £333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £333
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 224 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton and others
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.