Case 3303167/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Harrison v Leonard Cheshire Disability — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303167/2024
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrison Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Harrison brought a claim against Leonard Cheshire Disability in the Reading Employment Tribunal. The judgment records that the matter was heard in public by CVP on 15 July 2025 before Employment Judge Harrison, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Miss A McAuliffe, solicitor.
The tribunal decided that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the normal time limit, but that it was not presented within a further reasonable period. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that the reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim was treated as a constructive unfair dismissal claim. It was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time, but it was not presented within a further reasonable period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.