In person For the v Respondent — 2026

Case reference: 3303173/2024
Decision date: 30 January 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
Venue: Cambridge

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that Mr J J Hart brought a claim against Meridian Trust, heard at Cambridge before Employment Judge Tynan on 27, 28, 29 and 30 January 2026. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.

The tribunal stated that the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out findings of fact, legal reasoning, or any remedy, noting that reasons had been given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The GOV.UK listing category identifies disability discrimination, but the short judgment states only that the claim is not well founded and is dismissed. Oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The GOV.UK listing category identifies unfair dismissal, but the short judgment states only that the claim is not well founded and is dismissed. Oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.