Case 3303182/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M L Sim v Future Proof Technology Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303182/2024
- Decision date
- 9 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M L Sim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 20 March 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made of the claim.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. Awards were made of £13,749 gross for unauthorised deductions, £4,583 in damages for breach of contract relating to notice, and a sum for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £20,024.32 in total. The judgment was approved by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell on 9 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 19 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £13,749 gross. | Upheld | — | £13,749 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £4,583 awarded. | Upheld | — | £4,583 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement. PDF text shows '£1692,32' which appears to be a typographical rendering; the judgment's total (£20,024.32) is consistent with a holiday pay figure of approximately £1,692.32. Recorded as 1692 GBP integer; confidence reduced due to ambiguous formatting. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,024
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.