Case 3303212/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance and not represented. For the v Mr J Barker (Managing Director). — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303212/2021
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance and not represented. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a telephone hearing on 10 December 2021 before Employment Judge Bloom. The claimant did not attend and the judge recorded unsuccessful attempts to telephone the number provided. The respondent's managing director, Mr J Barker, attended. In the claimant's absence, no evidence was heard in support of the claim, and the claim was dismissed for failure to attend.
The respondent informed the tribunal that it did not intend to proceed with the counter-claim set out in the response. The tribunal therefore dismissed the counter-claim upon withdrawal by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claimant's claim because she did not attend the hearing and no evidence was heard in support of it. The judgment does not specify the underlying legal label(s) for the claim in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The respondent's counter-claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.