Case 3303222/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Butt v AGI Mobile Communications Limited Heard: By CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303222/2020
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Butt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 24 June 2021 before Employment Judge M Warren, with Mr A Butt appearing in person and the Respondent represented by its director, Mr M Wild. The written record contains only the tribunal's dispositive findings, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the record.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant's holiday pay claim and ordered the Respondent to pay £338.80. It dismissed the Claimant's claim for unpaid wages.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent did not provide the Claimant with written terms and conditions of employment and awarded compensation of £616. The judgment records that the total payable under the judgment was £954.80, to be paid without deduction and taxable in the hands of the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £339 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states that the Claimant's claim for unpaid wages failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The written record states that the Respondent did not provide the Claimant with written terms and conditions of employment and awarded compensation of £616. | Upheld | — | £616 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £955
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.