Case 3303236/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Tufall Hussain (Litigation Consultant) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303236/2020
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Panel members
- Mrs G Bhatt, Mr D Wharton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Watford by CVP on 15, 16 and 17 June 2022 before Employment Judge Alliott, with lay members Mrs G Bhatt and Mr D Wharton. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Tufall Hussain, a litigation consultant.
In the written judgment, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims of race discrimination and unauthorised deduction of wages were dismissed upon withdrawal. Those claims were therefore not determined on their merits in the written record.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal and age discrimination claims. The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record is limited to the result.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records this claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.