Case 3303237/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Joselia Balde v Stephen Wells Milberg Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303237/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Joselia Balde
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by telephone on 1 November 2021 before Employment Judge M Warren. The claimant, Miss Joselia Balde, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of age, religion and sexual orientation had been withdrawn.
The tribunal therefore dismissed those claims on the basis that they had been withdrawn. The judgment contains no findings on the substance of the allegations and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the religion discrimination claim was dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the sexual orientation discrimination claim was dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.