Case 3303257/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Bracey v Go-Haul Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303257/2022
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Bracey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 March 2023, the Tribunal gave Mrs C Bracey an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence dated 14 March 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records approval by Employment Judge Graham Date on 18 June 2025 and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 1 July 2025. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim for failure to respond to Tribunal correspondence and failure to actively pursue it. The substantive head is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than restated in the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim for failure to respond to Tribunal correspondence and failure to actively pursue it. The substantive head is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than restated in the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.