Case 3303269/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Abbas v Cook's Delight (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303269/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Abbas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a judgment dated 8 December 2021, found that Cook's Delight (in voluntary liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction of wages and was in breach of contract in relation to Mr O Abbas. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,173.33.
The written record contains no further findings or reasons beyond the outcome and award. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered payment of a net sum of £1,173.33, but the text does not split that sum between this claim and the breach of contract finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract and ordered payment of a net sum of £1,173.33, but the text does not split that sum between this claim and the unlawful deduction finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,173
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.