Case 3303270/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v G Singh Gill — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303270/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short consent judgment in which Ms A Rodriguez and Mr Gurminder Singh Gill appeared in person at Bury St Edmunds on 11 November 2022 before Employment Judge Mr A Spencer. The written decision records that the parties consented to the terms of the judgment and agreed those terms in full and final settlement of all claims between them.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £6,000.00. No separate findings of liability were set out, and no detailed reasons were provided in the written record because the judgment was given orally at the hearing.
The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless a request had been made at the hearing or a written request was made within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. No panel members are listed, and no statutory remedy breakdown is given beyond the agreed sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records that the parties consented to the terms of the judgment and that it was made in full and final settlement of all claims between them. The underlying claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment itself does not separately identify each pleaded claim. | Settled | — | £6,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.