Case 3303293/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr N Tudor, consultant — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303293/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded. At the hearing on 12 May 2025, the respondent conceded the claim in the sum of £1,145.22, and the tribunal recorded that amount as due to the claimant under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1966 as stated in the judgment.
The tribunal also awarded interest of £117.22 at 8%, with the amount agreed at the hearing and recorded under s.24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1966. In addition, the tribunal made an award of two weeks' pay in the sum of £1,100.00 under s.38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, based on the claimant's gross weekly pay of £550.
The judgment states that the total sum owed by the respondent to the claimant was £2,362.44. Employment Judge S Moore sat alone and approved the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent conceded the unlawful deduction claim at the hearing. Interest and a separate award of two weeks' pay were dealt with as additional remedies. | Upheld | — | £1,145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,362
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,100
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1966
- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1966
- s.38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.