Case 3303301/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr F-X Pierron v Pasqui Manuel and 1 other — 2022

Case reference: 3303301/2022
Decision date: 18 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill Date

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr F-X Pierron

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal had written to the claimant on 14 June 2022 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the ordinary unfair dismissal claims and the claims against P Manuel or managers should not be struck out. The same letter noted that the claimant had used the word whistleblowing in the claim form but had not provided details of any alleged protected disclosures, and gave him until 5 July 2022 to supply those details.

The claimant did not reply to that tribunal letter and also did not reply to the respondent's representative's email of 13 July 2022 seeking strike out. The tribunal struck out all complaints under the case number against all respondents because the claim was not being actively pursued and the claimant had failed to comply with tribunal orders. The hearing listed for 28 October 2022 was vacated.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment refers to claims of ordinary unfair dismissal and states that all complaints under the case number against all respondents are struck out.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment records that the claimant used the word whistleblowing in the claim form but gave no details of alleged protected disclosures, and did not provide details by the tribunal's deadline.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.