Case 3303306/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A T Lewis v TSG Building Services plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303306/2023
- Decision date
- 27 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A T Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied for interim relief in a claim he described as unfair dismissal following protected disclosures about health and safety issues. The tribunal noted that the respondent had not yet filed an ET3 and that the available material was limited to the claimant's ET1 and the parties' submissions at the interim stage.
The tribunal refused interim relief because it did not consider, on the material available, that the claimant was likely to succeed in establishing the required elements. The tribunal identified uncertainty about whether the claimant was employed by the respondent, whether protected disclosures had been made, and whether any dismissal was because of those disclosures. The judgment stated that the refusal should not be treated as a ruling on the underlying claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refused the claimant's application for interim relief in relation to an alleged protected disclosure unfair dismissal claim; it expressly stated this was not a ruling on the claim itself. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
- likely
- pretty good chance
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz [2011] IRLR 562
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.