Case 3303308/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs Coker, Director — 2018
- Case reference
- 3303308/2019
- Decision date
- 24 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondents conceded that the business closed on 24 December 2018 and that all staff were made redundant. They also conceded that the Claimant had not been paid his redundancy pay, notice pay, or outstanding holiday of five days.
On that basis, the Tribunal made a declaration that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,660.00 and ordered the Respondents to pay that sum. The judgment records this as a redundancy payment claim rather than a contested dismissal finding.
The Tribunal also found the Respondents were in breach of contract for failing to give notice. It awarded the Claimant 12 weeks' notice pay, calculated by reference to his net pay of £369.52, in the sum of £4,434.24.
Finally, the Tribunal found that the Claimant had accrued five days' unpaid holiday and ordered payment of £369.52. The judgment is a short oral reasons case and records no further disputed factual findings or legal test by name.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Respondents conceded the business closed on 24 December 2018 and that all staff were made redundant. The Tribunal declared the Claimant entitled to redundancy payment in the sum of £9,660.00. | Upheld | — | £9,660 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found the Respondents were in breach of contract for failing to give notice and awarded 12 weeks' notice pay based on net pay of £369.52. | Upheld | — | £4,434 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found the Claimant had accrued five days' unpaid holiday and ordered payment of £369.52. | Upheld | — | £370 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,464
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.