Case 3303318/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Rathore v LAHL (London Affordable Homes Limited) Mr B Kher — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303318/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Rathore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 4 December 2019 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. Neither the claimant, Mr R Rathore, nor the respondent, LAHL (London Affordable Homes Limited) and Mr B Kher, attended or were represented at the hearing. The tribunal noted that it had considered the information available about the reasons for the parties' absence and that there was no explanation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states only that the claim was dismissed after neither party attended or was represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states only that the claim was dismissed after neither party attended or was represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states only that the claim was dismissed after neither party attended or was represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.