Case 3303318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Reid v Mr M Smith and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303318/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs M Reid
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs M Reid, had been ordered to pay a deposit of £100.00 following a preliminary hearing on 24 June 2022, and that the order was sent to her on 29 June 2022. The judgment says the deposit was not paid.
Because the deposit was not paid, the tribunal struck out any complaint of unlawful discrimination under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted text does not identify the particular discrimination ground or grounds that were being pursued.
The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Anstis on 28 September 2022 and sent to the parties on 6 October 2022. No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment text beyond the unpaid £100.00 deposit order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'any complaint of unlawful discrimination' was struck out. The specific protected characteristic(s) are not identified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.