Case 3303325/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Burbridge v Hyster-Yale UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303325/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Burbridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs L Burbridge, brought a disability discrimination claim against Hyster-Yale UK Ltd. At this hearing on 10 June 2022 before Employment Judge Street, the tribunal dealt with preliminary issues rather than the merits of the underlying claim.
The tribunal extended time for the claimant to bring the disability discrimination claim, stating that it was just and equitable to do so. It also dismissed the respondent's strike out application. No findings on liability, compensation, or other remedy were made in the written record provided.
Judgment was given orally, and the record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal extended time for the claimant to bring the disability discrimination claim, finding it just and equitable to do so. The respondent's strike out application was dismissed. This judgment does not determine the merits of the discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.