Case 3303379/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Murrell v Softwerx Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303379/2024
- Decision date
- 9 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Annand Representation
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Murrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties agreed that the correct respondent was Softwerx Ltd. The case was heard by video at Cambridge Employment Tribunal on 9 September 2024 before Employment Judge Annand, with Mr Murrell appearing in person and Ms Evans, Solicitor, for the respondent.
The only substantive claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note on reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.