Case 3303383/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Gacevic v Rockley Dene Homes Ltd (T/a Cherry Hinton Care Home) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303383/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tuck QC
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Gacevic
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 1 February 2021, Employment Judge Tuck QC heard the claimant in person and the respondent by solicitor. The claimant had brought complaints of disability discrimination, unlawful deductions from wages, and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal noted that she lacked two years' service for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, but that issue was not the subject of the judgment.
The disability discrimination claim was dismissed because the tribunal found that Miss Gacevic had not shown that she was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal recorded the claimant's repeated position that she did not have any disability. It also considered whether the complaint might have been intended as a perceived disability claim, but concluded that the respondent would not have perceived her condition as long term on the evidence before it, and the claimant had not advanced the case on a section 15 basis.
The holiday pay claim was also dismissed. The claimant confirmed that she had asked for holiday pay and that, once requested, it was paid in full. The remaining unlawful deductions from wages claim was not determined at this hearing and was listed for a half-day hearing on 21 June 2021 by CVP.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant had not demonstrated that she had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time. It also considered whether the case might have been framed as perceived disability discrimination, but the claimant had said she did not have any disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant confirmed that she had requested holiday pay and that she was paid in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.