Case 3303383/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M MBUGUA v Appian Construction Limited, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303383/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss M MBUGUA
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 20 August 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss M Mbugua an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders of 13 January 2025 and 20 August 2025, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 3 to 6 February 2026 did not take place. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Cowen on 1 October 2025 and sent to the parties on 22 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant had not complied with tribunal orders dated 13 January 2025 and 20 August 2025, and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.