Case 3303384/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303384/2021
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal changed the respondent's name to Yodel Delivery Network Limited and refused the claimant's application to amend her claims. It recorded that the hearing took place at Watford by CVP on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge George, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
In case 3303384/2021, the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal also struck out a complaint of direct discrimination arising from a request that the claimant move to the Gate House on 3 June 2020, treating that point as an abuse of process.
The tribunal further struck out the remaining discrimination complaints in case 3303384/2021 under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had no reasonable prospects of success. Case 3306233/2021 was also struck out under Rule 37 on the same basis. The written record gives the outcome only and states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of direct discrimination in relation to a request that the claimant move to the Gate House on 3 June 2020 was struck out as an abuse of process. The written record does not spell out every allegation, but the case was recorded as a disability discrimination matter. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The remaining discrimination complaints in case 3303384/2021 were struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Other | Case 3306233/2021 was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The short written record does not identify the substantive complaint in this case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- abuse of process
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.