Case 3303391/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hewitt v Sai Global — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303391/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was received to the claimant's claim. The tribunal therefore entered judgment on the papers and upheld the pleaded monetary claims set out in the judgment.
It found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £923.07. It also found that he had not been paid for 2 days of accrued holiday, awarding £184.61 gross for that item.
The judgment also records a further award of 2 weeks' pay in the sum of £923.07 in relation to itemised pay slips. The wording in the extracted text is awkward, but the award is clearly stated as a separate gross sum.
The aggregate of the three awards is £2,030.75. The judgment does not set out any additional remedy components, interest, or legal reasoning beyond the listed orders.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £923.07. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant was not paid for 2 days accrued holiday in the gross sum of £184.61. | Upheld | — | £185 |
| Other | The judgment says the respondent was further to provide the claimant itemised pay slips and awards 2 weeks' pay in the sum of £923.07. The extracted wording is awkward, but the remedy is recorded as a gross sum of £923.07. | Upheld | — | £923 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,031
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.