Case 3303391/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sulaiman v MoreCare Services (UK) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303391/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Sulaiman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, issued by Employment Judge Anstis on 19 May 2022. The tribunal found that the respondent, MoreCare Services (UK) Ltd, had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant, Mr S Sulaiman, the sum of £32,343.31. The judgment text does not set out a breakdown of how this figure was calculated, nor does it separately address the redundancy pay or unfair dismissal claims indicated in the gov.uk listing categories.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 22 August 2022 and entered in the register by N Gotecha for the Tribunal Office.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £32,343.31. The judgment text does not separately adjudicate redundancy pay or unfair dismissal claims listed in the gov.uk categories; only the unlawful deduction claim is addressed in this document. | Upheld | — | £32,343 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,343
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.