Case 3303394/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Livingston, counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303394/2020
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mr A Scott
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Livingston, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, sitting with Employment Judge George and members Mr D Bean and Mr A Scott, heard the case on 22 to 24 November 2021, with discussion in chambers on 25 November and a hybrid hearing on 26 November 2021. It found that the claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal/breach of contract, and race discrimination were not well founded and dismissed them all.
No monetary remedy was awarded. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as a wrongful dismissal/breach of contract claim and dismisses it as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.