Case 3303401/2020 · Employment Tribunal
1) Mr E Archibald, senior 2) Mr E Archibald, junior v Luxuria Property Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303401/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1) Mr E Archibald, senior 2) Mr E Archibald, junior
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 3 September 2021, sitting by CVP at Watford, Employment Judge Parkin recorded that the respondent was Luxuria Property Ltd. The tribunal found that Mr E Archibald senior was a worker within the meaning of regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Archibald senior £1,950.00 gross as compensation for accrued paid annual leave pursuant to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. No separate split between different heads of loss is given in the judgment.
The claim of Mr E Archibald junior was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not give separate reasons for that dismissal in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found Mr E Archibald senior was a worker within regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered £1,950.00 gross as compensation for accrued paid annual leave under regulation 14. | Upheld | — | £1,950 |
| Holiday pay | The claim of Mr E Archibald junior was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not set out separate reasons for that dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,950
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,950
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.