Case 3303409/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss MS McLean v William Hill Organization Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303409/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss MS McLean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment for Miss MS McLean v William Hill Organization Limited contains only a short disposal. It states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Miss MS McLean. No findings on the merits of any substantive complaint are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type, make any liability findings, or record any remedy. It is therefore not possible from the extracted text to say whether the case involved discrimination, redundancy, unlawful deductions, working time, or any other specific heads of claim, beyond the fact that the proceedings ended because the claim was withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type; it records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.