Case 3303440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lukomski (Representative with Concilium) For the v Ms K Chrustowska (HR manager with the Respondent) Strike Out Decision – — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303440/2021
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Appearance
- Venue
- Watford in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lukomski (Representative with Concilium) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and money claims for holiday pay, arrears of pay, and failure to pay overtime. At the preliminary hearing on 31 August 2021, Employment Judge O'Neill considered that the effective date of termination was likely 19 October 2020, as stated in the ET1, and accepted that the claimant was reasonable in relying on the dismissal letter when identifying the termination date.
On that basis, the tribunal calculated that the three-month time limit under section 111 ERA 1996 would have expired on 18 January 2021, but ACAS early conciliation extended the deadline to 26 March 2021. The ET1 was not presented until 29 March 2021, so it was still out of time.
The judge considered whether it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims in time under section 111(2)(b) ERA 1996, but was not satisfied that this test was met. The claimant's representative had advised her throughout the ACAS conciliation period, and although a paper ET1 had apparently been attempted earlier, the tribunal inferred that there had been time to correct and submit the claim in time. The unfair dismissal claim and the money claims were therefore struck out under rule 37 as having no reasonable prospect of success because they were lodged out of time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out as out of time; the tribunal treated 19 October 2020 as the likely effective date of termination and found the ET1 presented on 29 March 2021 remained late after ACAS early conciliation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Part of the money claims struck out for lateness under the statutory time limit; the judgment identified holiday pay as one of the monetary heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Covers the arrears of pay claim (described as underpayment of wages in September 2020) and the alleged failure to pay overtime; both were struck out as presented out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.