Mr J Tychmanowicz v UPS limited — 2024

Case reference: 3303443/2022
Decision date: 28 February 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Tychmanowicz

Respondent

UPS limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the only complaint before it was unfair dismissal, as clarified at a hearing on 23 January 2023 and confirmed again at the final hearing.

The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. Because that was the only complaint, the entire claim was dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the written judgment does not set out further findings or reasoning.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed; it was the only complaint.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.