Case 3303453/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Luke Weynberg v Sabio HR Consultancy Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303453/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Luke Weynberg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Sabio HR Consultancy Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from Luke Weynberg's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,626.82, described as the shortfall between the wages properly payable and the amount actually paid during the period 1 November 2021 to 15 February 2022.
The claimant's further claim for financial loss attributable to the unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed. No separate compensatory, basic award, injury to feelings, or interest award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net shortfall between wages properly payable and wages actually paid during the period 1 November 2021 to 15 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £3,627 |
| Other | Claim for financial loss attributable to the unlawful deduction from wages; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,627
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.