Case 3303457/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Beautiman v Abacus Taverns Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303457/2024
- Decision date
- 3 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Beautiman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 29 January 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss S Beautiman an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 8 November 2024 and that the case had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Hutchings ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits of any underlying claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 8 November 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.