Case 3303459/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Lovegrove v Tipsey Vegan (Norwich) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303459/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Lovegrove
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 25 March 2024. On 3 June 2024 a judicial decision was made that the claim was presented against Tipsey Vegan (Norwich) Limited and that it complied with early conciliation requirements.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,035.09, being £373.11 plus £661.98 as calculated in the claim form.
The respondent was ordered to pay that sum, without deduction, within 14 days of the date the judgment is sent. The judgment records that the figure is net and that, if any PAYE payments are required, the respondent must account for those to the proper authorities in addition to paying the £1,035.09.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net sum of £1,035.09 ordered, being £373.11 plus £661.98 as calculated in the claim form. Payable within 14 days without deduction; respondent must separately account for any PAYE. | Upheld | — | £1,035 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,035
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 – Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.