Case 3303463/2020 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Mrs Younis (consultant) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303463/2020
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was before Employment Judge Wyeth at Watford by CVP on 2 November 2022. The claimant did not attend and the respondent was represented by Mrs Younis, a consultant. The judgment records that EJ Michell had made a deposit order on 19 May 2022.
The tribunal said that the claimant's only remaining claim was race discrimination. Because the deposit ordered on 19 May 2022 was not paid when the time for payment expired, the claim was struck out under rule 39(4) of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013.
No merits findings or compensation award were recorded, and the judgment contains no separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's only remaining claim was race discrimination. It was struck out under rule 39(4) of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013 after EJ Michell made a deposit order on 19 May 2022 and no deposit was paid within the time allowed. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.