Case 3303476/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Tavares v Greenace Contract Cleaning Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303476/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Tavares
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr H Tavares, brought claims against Greenace Contract Cleaning Limited that included a redundancy payment claim, a claim for unpaid wages, a claim for unpaid expenses, and a claim for unpaid and untaken annual leave. The case was heard by Employment Judge T Brown at Reading by Cloud Video Platform on 22 March 2023.
The tribunal recorded that the redundancy payment claim had not been pursued and dismissed it. The claim for unpaid wages was also dismissed because it was not proved.
By contrast, the tribunal found the claims for unpaid expenses and for unpaid and untaken annual leave were well-founded in part. It ordered the respondent to pay £5,630.75 for unpaid expenses and £1,481.85 for unpaid and untaken annual leave, in each case without deductions for tax or National Insurance. No separate interest figure or other remedy was recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant’s redundancy payment claim was stated not to have been pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid wages was not proved. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for unpaid expenses was well-founded in part; the tribunal ordered payment of £5,630.75 without deductions for tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,631 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid and untaken annual leave was well-founded in part; the tribunal ordered payment of £1,481.85 without deductions for tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,482 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,113
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.