Case 3303477/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Barry v Elite Moving Systems Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303477/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Barry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 20 April 2022 in the South East Employment Tribunals. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge George Date decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal and other payments succeeds. It does not set out detailed findings on the merits of the dismissal or itemise the monetary elements at this stage.
The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No award is quantified in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says the claim for unfair dismissal succeeds under rule 21, with remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'other payments' succeeding. The gov.uk listing for the case identifies an unlawful deduction from wages claim, but the judgment text itself does not itemise that claim separately. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.