Case 3303478/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Z Malik (solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303478/2022
- Decision date
- 15 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs A Brosnan, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Watford on 28, 29, 30 and 31 May 2024 before Employment Judge Alliott, with Mrs A Brosnan and Mr A Scott as members. The claimant, Mr Lydon Ashun, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Z Malik, solicitor.
The written judgment records that the claimant’s claims of race discrimination, unauthorised deduction of wages, and failure to give an initial statement of employment particulars were dismissed. No monetary award was made.
The decision note states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. The extracted judgment does not include the tribunal’s detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to give an initial statement of employment particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.