Case 3303487/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Iuditha Bigiu v Pressbeau (Beds) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303487/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Iuditha Bigiu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Michell, sitting alone in Cambridge on 14 October 2019, dismissed Iuditha Bigiu’s claim against Pressbeau (Beds) Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because it had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The judgment explains that the claim was presented on 28 January 2019, following the claimant’s resignation on 5 July 2018, and that early conciliation did not begin until 9 January 2019. On that basis, the tribunal found the claim was presented more than three months after the expiry of the limitation period provided by s.123 of the Equality Act 2010. The merits were not determined.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type or protected characteristic. It states the claim was out of time under s.123 Equality Act 2010 and that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.