Case 3303490/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wilkinson v A&O IT Group plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303490/2022
- Decision date
- 26 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Wilkinson brought a claim against A&O IT Group Plc for unauthorised deductions from wages. The hearing took place at Reading via CVP on 15 March 2023 before Employment Judge Eeley, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms A Coutts, HR Director.
The written judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £5,087.61 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. No other claim types or remedies are identified in the written decision.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The written judgment therefore contains only the outcome and the sum awarded, without a further written analysis of the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,087.61 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £5,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,088
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.