Case 3303505/2024 · Employment Tribunal
1. Ms Terina Strugnell 2. Mrs Eileen Dunn v DOK cafe Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303505/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
Parties
3 namedClaimant
1. Ms Terina Strugnell 2. Mrs Eileen Dunn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that both claimants brought claims for a redundancy payment and unpaid holiday pay against DOK cafe Ltd and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The hearing took place at Cambridge by CVP on 30 January 2025 before Employment Judge Andrew Clarke KC, with both claimants appearing in person and no attendance by either respondent.
The judgment dismisses the claims on behalf of both claimants for a redundancy payment and unpaid holiday pay against both respondents. The written record does not set out reasons beyond noting that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claims on behalf of both claimants for a redundancy payment are dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claims on behalf of both claimants for unpaid holiday pay are dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.