Case 3303508/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Hejazi v Henry’s Barbers Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303508/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs A Hejazi
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs A Hejazi was constructively dismissed by the second respondent, Henry's Limited, and that her unfair dismissal complaint succeeded against that respondent. The tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay £12,211 in total, made up of a basic award of £10,336, financial losses of £1,375, and £500 for compensation for loss of statutory rights.
The complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay were dismissed. The judgment also states that all complaints against the first respondent, Henry's Barbers Limited, failed and were dismissed. The first respondent's application for costs was refused.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was constructively dismissed by the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £12,211 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,211
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,336
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,875
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.