Case 3303517/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Neckles For the v Ms R. Jones — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303517/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Hunt Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J. Neckles For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Watford by CVP on 2 to 5 December 2025 before Employment Judge M. Hunt. The written judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed, the claim of wrongful dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed, the claim of race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed, and the claim of victimisation was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.