Case 3303519/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Carter v Sew on and sew forth Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303519/2022
- Decision date
- 8 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 21 April 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,205.00. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,307.50.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing, but the judgment itself also states the specific sums payable for notice damages and redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,205.00. | Upheld | — | £2,205 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,307.50. | Upheld | — | £3,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.