Case 3303526/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Upton v Club Lusso Limited (formerly The Club Group International Limited and The Club Group Limited) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303526/2022
- Decision date
- 23 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gianferrari REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Upton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Upton brought three money claims against Club Lusso Limited, formerly The Club Group International Limited and The Club Group Limited, heard at Watford by CVP on 31 October 2022 before Employment Judge Gianferrari. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal held that the claimant succeeded on her claim described as breach of contract unauthorised deductions from pay in the sum of £11,538.48. It also held that her claim for holiday pay accrued and owed succeeded in the sum of £1,157.64.
The claimant further succeeded on her breach of contract claim for non-payment of notice pay in the sum of £2,884.62. The judgment records that she succeeded in respect of all three claims before the tribunal.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £15,580.74, described as the gross figure for the sums owed. No separate breakdown of any wider statutory remedy, interest, or other award is set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract unauthorised deductions from pay. | Upheld | — | £11,538 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as holiday pay accrued and owed. | Upheld | — | £1,158 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as breach of contract for non-payment of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,581
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.