Case 3303530/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Khaled Yakoub Esmair v Your World Healthcare — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303530/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freshwater Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Khaled Yakoub Esmair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found Mr Khaled Yakoub Esmair's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages well-founded and allowed it. The written judgment records awards for deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay and notice pay; it does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Your World Healthcare was directed to pay Mr Esmair a total gross sum of £15,879.55, comprising £8,244.51 for deductions from wages, £6,921.11 for unpaid holiday pay and £713.93 for notice pay. Payment was directed within 28 days of receipt of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,245 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this component as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £6,921 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this component as notice pay but does not separately identify its cause of action in the operative text. | Upheld | — | £714 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.