Case 3303531/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Lunt v Nigel Gittins / Webroster Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303531/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Lunt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment is a short disposal order rather than a substantive liability decision, so it does not set out factual findings, legal analysis, or any compensation calculation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying pleading is identified in the GOV.UK listing as breach of contract, but the judgment text itself does not separately analyse it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying pleading is identified in the GOV.UK listing as unlawful deduction from wages, but the judgment text itself does not separately analyse it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.