Case 3303544/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Cooper v Traditional Renovations Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303544/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Postle issued a Rule 21 judgment on 23 September 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims against Traditional Renovations Ltd were dismissed because the claimant was no longer actively pursuing the claim.
The extracted judgment does not separate out the pleaded heads of claim or give any substantive findings on liability. It is a procedural dismissal only, and the judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 21 because the claimant was no longer actively pursuing the claim; the judgment gives no separate factual findings on this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 21 because the claimant was no longer actively pursuing the claim; the judgment gives no separate factual findings on this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.