Case 3303553/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Daylight (LB of Islington) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303553/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely by CVP at Watford on 24 March 2021 before Employment Judge Hanning. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal’s substantive finding was short and categorical: the claimant was not employed by the respondent at any time. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed all claims against the respondent. No separate liability analysis, findings on dismissal circumstances, or remedy assessment is recorded in the written judgment.
The judgment therefore records a dismissal of the claim on the threshold issue of employment status. No monetary award was made or discussed in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not employed by the respondent at any time, so all claims against the respondent were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.