Case 3303555/2019 · Employment Tribunal
S Beuely (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303555/2019
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
S Beuely (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs X Youlden, succeeded on her unfair dismissal claim. Employment Judge Cassel recorded that it had been conceded that she was unfairly dismissed, and judgment was entered for the claimant in the sum of £5,733.84, payable by the respondent within 14 days.
The judgment also records a wrongful dismissal claim. That claim was dismissed on withdrawal, so no substantive determination was made on its merits and no separate remedy was awarded for it.
The reasons given in the short judgment are limited to the concession on unfair dismissal and the withdrawal of the wrongful dismissal claim. No legal test is identified in the text provided, and no panel members are listed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that unfair dismissal was conceded by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £5,734 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,734
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.