Case 3303564/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Esteves v Orlando Williams t/a Sakura — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303564/2019
- Decision date
- 5 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Esteves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Postle recorded that Ms S Esteves had been subject to an unauthorised deduction from wages by Orlando Williams t/a Sakura. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £225 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice. On that basis, the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £1,680.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text. The hearing listed for 5 July 2019 was cancelled after the judgment was entered.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross/net sum of £225. | Upheld | — | £225 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,680. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,905
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.