Case 3303569/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Molana v TRL Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303569/2018
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Molana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in the claims brought by Miss R Molana against TRL Limited. The tribunal referred to case numbers 3303569/2018, 3314505/2019, 3320564/2019 and 3301369/2021, and recorded that the claims were struck out.
The tribunal said that by letter dated 10 September 2021 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they were not being actively pursued and/or because a fair hearing was no longer possible. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. The extracted judgment contains no findings on the underlying merits of the claims and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they were not being actively pursued and/or because a fair hearing was no longer possible. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.